LEWIS HINE
ANALYSING SOCIAL
DOCUMENTARY
I have chosen two pictures to dicuss, one by Lewis Hine and
the other by Jacob Riis. Both pictures I
like to look at.. and well the first one very familiar to me as I expect to
many.
Lewis Hine was
commissioned to photograph the building of the empire state building – my first
thoughts are of how dangerous it all looks, my husband is in construction and
the things they get up to are bad enough, but I don’t think they have had lunch
balanced on a steel.
These pictures do as they say and really document the proceedings. You feel like you are a part of it and it
shows a proper insight.
The workmen having lunch are the subject of the picture,
although so is the project as a whole the empire state building. This is the context – this is the setting –
which is very much part of the picture.
As I said before the photographer Lewis Hine was commissioned
to do this.
Now did the workmen give their consent, I would say no as it
may have been the photographer just saw this from afar and took the shot and
they are all very relaxed and not looking at the camera. However I’m sure they would have consented if
asked but the picture may have had a much more staged look.
I feel this picture does have a ‘Hine’ feel about it and
looking at the selection of pictures they have a similarity about them. Most of them show a frieghteningly lack of safety which makes you tummy churn.
The photograph is very successful .. it is imfamous anyway but also shows the
men relaxing having lunch in the most bizzare circumstances and is a comical
juxtaposition.
I feel this picture is an example of social documentary as I
feel its life events happening rather than a news event ( although the building
of the Empire State would be a news event ) but I feel that these pictures are
more about the workers.
The second picture ..
is by Jacob Riis – How the
other half lives. – Bandits Roost. 1888.New York.
This book highlighted the conditions in the slums of New
York – Riis was a photographer as a pasttime but also found it a useful tool
when writing police reports on the New York slums – he was a successful police
reporter.
The picture is in one of the dangerous alleys of New York,
where all criminal activity took place.
The police would have accompanied the photographer on such outings and
shoots so you wonder what the discussions would have been between them as to
what they were trying to interpret from the photo .. There is a possibility that
he was being paid as a reporter, although a large percentage was taken for his
own self.
I feel the people did give their consent as they are all
looking at the camera and also because of the long camera exposure you would
have more movement in the image if they were not asked to stay still. But mainly because they all look like they
are participating.
I feel the photo does show the dirt and dinge, but maybe not
how aggressive the people may have been .. or showing the danger.
These pictures were a social documentation of the situation and lives
in the slums.
JACOB RIIS